Drea Knufken
This is a guest post by Jacob Cherian of SourcingLine.
In a recent statement, President Barack Obama implied that he would cut tax breaks to companies offshoring jobs overseas.
It appears the move is to arrest the outflow of jobs from the U.S. But analysts are not sure if this new regulation will have the desired impact. If the U.S. does not allow for offshoring costs to be accounted as expenses in balance sheets, U.S. firms will likely see their offshoring costs go up by about 35-40 percent.
That sounds like a steep rise, but in actuality it is not. For instance, the cost of hiring an engineer is about $50-$60/hour in the U.S. for IT related projects. The same job would cost $25-$30/hour in India or China under the present circumstances and $35-40/hour under the new legislation. This would mean that it is still cheaper to offshore projects to low cost destinations like India and China.
Vice-President of Nasscom, Ameet Nivsarker, commented in an online report by The Hindu that the proposal is really about going after U.S. firms that have established their units in lower tax areas in order to book profits.
Yet another interpretation to the outsourcing story is that it would offer U.S. firms an alibi to maintain price pressures on offshoring, This would have an impact on the American-centric players like outsourcing giants Infosys, Wipro and Tata Consultancy Services of India. Alternatively, it would drive major outsourcers in India to seek more lucrative contracts in Europe and elsewhere.
The IT industry’s trade body in India, Nasscom, says that 5.8 percent of the country’s GDP stems from IT. This is in comparison to a mere 1.2 percent in the financial year 1997-98. IT industry leaders in the United States are also lobbying against U.S. protectionism. India, considered the back office to the world, has much to ponder.
Jacob Cherian writes for SourcingLine, a leading source of data on news and directories linked to outsourcing.
